reaperdoesntknow/TopologicalQwen
Text Generation • 2B • Updated
Convergent Intelligence PRO
reaperdoesntknow
AI & ML interests
About Us
Mission
Convergent Intelligence advances original research in discrepancy calculus, adaptive systems, and applied AI, translating those insights into client controls, playbooks, and leadership-ready briefs.
Recent Activity
updated a model about 5 hours ago
reaperdoesntknow/TopologicalQwen published a model about 5 hours ago
reaperdoesntknow/TopologicalQwen reacted to theirpost with 👍 about 7 hours ago
We present a methodology for training small language models on CPU at FP32 precision
that achieves capability-per-dollar efficiency orders of magnitude beyond GPU-based training.
Across15modelsspanningfournovelarchitecturefamilies—MixtureofAttentions(MoA),cross-
architecture fusion (Qemma), swarm intelligence (SAGI), and metric-space causal language
models (DiscoverLM)—total compute cost was $24 on a single AMD EPYC 9454P proces-
sor. We introduce seven methodological pillars: (1) FP32 precision preservation, with exper-
iments demonstrating 5,810×single-operation error and 23,225×compounding error ratio for
FP16 at network depth; (2) sparse cognitive architectures where 0.02–7% of parameters activate
per token, matching CPU branching rather than GPU SIMD; (3) developmental curriculum
training progressing from language to logic to transfer to depth; (4) continuous belt-fed data
ingestion eliminating truncation waste; (5) hardware-native optimization for AMD Zen 4 via
AOCL/OpenMP/NUMA-aware allocation; (6) self-regulating thermodynamic governance with
emergent temperature measurement grounded in L2-star discrepancy; and (7) open-standard
compute (AVX2 SIMD at FP32) free of proprietary vendor dependency. We argue that trans-
formers were designed for GPU hardware rather than mathematical optimality, and that archi-
tectures designed for geometric correctness—metric-space attention, triangle inequality enforce-
ment, sparse expert routing—naturally favor CPU execution. For sub-2B parameter models,
CPU training produces more capable models at a fraction of the cost.Organizations
updated a
model about 5 hours ago
published a
model about 5 hours ago
reactedto their post with 👍 about 7 hours ago
Post
46
We present a methodology for training small language models on CPU at FP32 precision
that achieves capability-per-dollar efficiency orders of magnitude beyond GPU-based training.
Across15modelsspanningfournovelarchitecturefamilies—MixtureofAttentions(MoA),cross-
architecture fusion (Qemma), swarm intelligence (SAGI), and metric-space causal language
models (DiscoverLM)—total compute cost was $24 on a single AMD EPYC 9454P proces-
sor. We introduce seven methodological pillars: (1) FP32 precision preservation, with exper-
iments demonstrating 5,810×single-operation error and 23,225×compounding error ratio for
FP16 at network depth; (2) sparse cognitive architectures where 0.02–7% of parameters activate
per token, matching CPU branching rather than GPU SIMD; (3) developmental curriculum
training progressing from language to logic to transfer to depth; (4) continuous belt-fed data
ingestion eliminating truncation waste; (5) hardware-native optimization for AMD Zen 4 via
AOCL/OpenMP/NUMA-aware allocation; (6) self-regulating thermodynamic governance with
emergent temperature measurement grounded in L2-star discrepancy; and (7) open-standard
compute (AVX2 SIMD at FP32) free of proprietary vendor dependency. We argue that trans-
formers were designed for GPU hardware rather than mathematical optimality, and that archi-
tectures designed for geometric correctness—metric-space attention, triangle inequality enforce-
ment, sparse expert routing—naturally favor CPU execution. For sub-2B parameter models,
CPU training produces more capable models at a fraction of the cost.
that achieves capability-per-dollar efficiency orders of magnitude beyond GPU-based training.
Across15modelsspanningfournovelarchitecturefamilies—MixtureofAttentions(MoA),cross-
architecture fusion (Qemma), swarm intelligence (SAGI), and metric-space causal language
models (DiscoverLM)—total compute cost was $24 on a single AMD EPYC 9454P proces-
sor. We introduce seven methodological pillars: (1) FP32 precision preservation, with exper-
iments demonstrating 5,810×single-operation error and 23,225×compounding error ratio for
FP16 at network depth; (2) sparse cognitive architectures where 0.02–7% of parameters activate
per token, matching CPU branching rather than GPU SIMD; (3) developmental curriculum
training progressing from language to logic to transfer to depth; (4) continuous belt-fed data
ingestion eliminating truncation waste; (5) hardware-native optimization for AMD Zen 4 via
AOCL/OpenMP/NUMA-aware allocation; (6) self-regulating thermodynamic governance with
emergent temperature measurement grounded in L2-star discrepancy; and (7) open-standard
compute (AVX2 SIMD at FP32) free of proprietary vendor dependency. We argue that trans-
formers were designed for GPU hardware rather than mathematical optimality, and that archi-
tectures designed for geometric correctness—metric-space attention, triangle inequality enforce-
ment, sparse expert routing—naturally favor CPU execution. For sub-2B parameter models,
CPU training produces more capable models at a fraction of the cost.
posted an update about 12 hours ago
Post
46
We present a methodology for training small language models on CPU at FP32 precision
that achieves capability-per-dollar efficiency orders of magnitude beyond GPU-based training.
Across15modelsspanningfournovelarchitecturefamilies—MixtureofAttentions(MoA),cross-
architecture fusion (Qemma), swarm intelligence (SAGI), and metric-space causal language
models (DiscoverLM)—total compute cost was $24 on a single AMD EPYC 9454P proces-
sor. We introduce seven methodological pillars: (1) FP32 precision preservation, with exper-
iments demonstrating 5,810×single-operation error and 23,225×compounding error ratio for
FP16 at network depth; (2) sparse cognitive architectures where 0.02–7% of parameters activate
per token, matching CPU branching rather than GPU SIMD; (3) developmental curriculum
training progressing from language to logic to transfer to depth; (4) continuous belt-fed data
ingestion eliminating truncation waste; (5) hardware-native optimization for AMD Zen 4 via
AOCL/OpenMP/NUMA-aware allocation; (6) self-regulating thermodynamic governance with
emergent temperature measurement grounded in L2-star discrepancy; and (7) open-standard
compute (AVX2 SIMD at FP32) free of proprietary vendor dependency. We argue that trans-
formers were designed for GPU hardware rather than mathematical optimality, and that archi-
tectures designed for geometric correctness—metric-space attention, triangle inequality enforce-
ment, sparse expert routing—naturally favor CPU execution. For sub-2B parameter models,
CPU training produces more capable models at a fraction of the cost.
that achieves capability-per-dollar efficiency orders of magnitude beyond GPU-based training.
Across15modelsspanningfournovelarchitecturefamilies—MixtureofAttentions(MoA),cross-
architecture fusion (Qemma), swarm intelligence (SAGI), and metric-space causal language
models (DiscoverLM)—total compute cost was $24 on a single AMD EPYC 9454P proces-
sor. We introduce seven methodological pillars: (1) FP32 precision preservation, with exper-
iments demonstrating 5,810×single-operation error and 23,225×compounding error ratio for
FP16 at network depth; (2) sparse cognitive architectures where 0.02–7% of parameters activate
per token, matching CPU branching rather than GPU SIMD; (3) developmental curriculum
training progressing from language to logic to transfer to depth; (4) continuous belt-fed data
ingestion eliminating truncation waste; (5) hardware-native optimization for AMD Zen 4 via
AOCL/OpenMP/NUMA-aware allocation; (6) self-regulating thermodynamic governance with
emergent temperature measurement grounded in L2-star discrepancy; and (7) open-standard
compute (AVX2 SIMD at FP32) free of proprietary vendor dependency. We argue that trans-
formers were designed for GPU hardware rather than mathematical optimality, and that archi-
tectures designed for geometric correctness—metric-space attention, triangle inequality enforce-
ment, sparse expert routing—naturally favor CPU execution. For sub-2B parameter models,
CPU training produces more capable models at a fraction of the cost.
updated a
model about 17 hours ago
published a
model about 17 hours ago
updated a
model about 22 hours ago
published a
model about 23 hours ago
updated a
model 2 days ago
published a
model 2 days ago
updated a
collection 2 days ago
updated a
model 2 days ago
published a
model 2 days ago
updated a
model 3 days ago
published a
model 3 days ago
updated a
collection 3 days ago
updated a
model 3 days ago
published a
model 3 days ago
updated a
model 3 days ago