Datasets:
File size: 1,939 Bytes
384af4c | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 | ---
license: mit
tags: [code, assertion-completion, repository-level]
---
# code2lora-data-commits — per-commit dataset (GRU)
One parquet row per (repository, kept commit), carrying:
* `commit_sha`, `commit_index`, `commit_timestamp`
* `production_code_diff` -- diff vs the previous kept commit
* `diff_embedding` -- Qwen3-Embedding of the diff (fp16, [2048])
* `repo_state_embedding` -- Qwen3-Embedding of the full repo state at this
commit (fp16, [2048])
* `cross_repo_split`, `in_repo_split` -- the two split labels (see below)
## Layout
```
commits/
cr_train.parquet commits from the 400 train repos
cr_val.parquet commits from held-out cr-val repos
cr_test.parquet commits from held-out cr-test repos
ood_test.parquet commits from the post-cutoff OOD repos
```
## Split semantics
Two independent split axes:
* `cross_repo_split ∈ {train, cr_val, cr_test}` -- which **repositories** the model has seen.
* `in_repo_split ∈ {train, val, test}` -- chronological 80/10/10 split of each repo's **commits**.
The four evaluation suites used in the paper map onto these axes as follows:
| Paper suite | File | Selection |
|---|---|---|
| Train (loss) | `qna/cr_train.parquet` | `in_repo_split == "train"` |
| IR val | `qna/cr_train.parquet` | `in_repo_split == "val"` |
| IR test | `qna/cr_train.parquet` | `in_repo_split == "test"` |
| CR val | `qna/cr_val.parquet` | all rows |
| CR test | `qna/cr_test.parquet` | all rows |
All evaluation suites use the **full uncapped** assertion set. Only the in-repo train loss path is smart-capped (see `code2lora/code2lora-data-smartcap`).
## Companion datasets
* `code2lora/code2lora-data-smartcap` smart-capped per-commit QnAs for training
* `code2lora/code2lora-data-snapshots` static-snapshot variant
* `code2lora/code2lora-data-ood` OOD repos in the same schema
|